Conflict, Controversy, Compromise, and Compression: The Pragmatics of Transdisciplinary (Development) Projects

Bärnthaler, Richard ORCID: (2020) Conflict, Controversy, Compromise, and Compression: The Pragmatics of Transdisciplinary (Development) Projects. Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 13 (2). pp. 193-210. ISSN 1999-253X

3462-Article Text-11174-1-10-20201231.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0).

Download (153kB) | Preview


Drawing upon qualitative interviews, this article narrates some central controversies and conflicts that scholars in the field of ‘development’ face in their daily work. Based on how such conflicts and controversies have been reconstructed, I place them in a discourse on transdisciplinarity, drawing into question the claims to authority and novelty around the term ‘transdisciplinarity’ that Western institutions have attributed to themselves in recent years. I also address the question of collaboration: How can transdisciplinary projects deal with the fact of pluralism, on the one hand, and the necessity to work towards shared problem definitions, and strategies, on the other hand? In this context, I make a case against transdisciplinarity’s oft-cited conceptions of harmony, comprehensiveness, totality, and unity; and a case for conflict, compromise, partiality, and joint contextual strategies.The “art of deliberation” thus replaces the notion of transcendence as a central competence of transdisciplinary scholars.

Item Type: Article
Keywords: Development Research, Disagreement, Pluralism, Situated Judgments, Transdisciplinarity
Divisions: Departments > Sozioökonomie > Multi-Level Governance and Development
Version of the Document: Published
Depositing User: Gertraud Novotny
Date Deposited: 07 Jan 2021 09:16
Last Modified: 07 Jan 2021 09:16
Related URLs:


View Item View Item


Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics