The carrot or the stick: Self-regulation for gender-diverse boards via codes of good governance

Mensi-Klarbach, Heike and Leixnering, Stephan and Schiffinger, Michael (2019) The carrot or the stick: Self-regulation for gender-diverse boards via codes of good governance. Journal of Business Ethics. pp. 1-17. ISSN 1573-0697

[img]
Preview
Text
Mensi-Klarbach2019_Article_TheCarrotOrTheStickSelf-Regula.pdf
Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0).

Download (819kB) | Preview

Abstract

Scholars have emphasized the potential of self-regulation, realized through "codes of good governance", to improve gender diversity on boards. Yet, unconvinced of the effectiveness of this self-regulation, many regulators have implemented mandatory quota laws. Our study sheds light on this dilemma. Seeking to broaden our conceptual knowledge of how such "codes" work in the specific case of gender diversity on boards, we ask: Under which conditions is self-regulation via voluntary principles of good governance effective? Expanding recent institutional-theory perspectives from the literature of women on boards, we show that, in the case of Austria, self-regulation via code recommendations is ineffective unless supported by additional forces. The primary reason for this, we argue, is that nominators do not expect benefits from gender-diverse boards. Furthermore, non-compliant companies face little pressure to change due to the small number of companies that have already adopted respective code recommendations. We identify two potential alternatives to boost the effectiveness of voluntary self-regulation for gender diverse boards: First, the introduction of concrete targets for female representation and the public monitoring of fulfillment; and, second, the establishment of a credible threat that mandatory quotas will be imposed if diversity goals are not achieved. Drawing on longitudinal data from 2006-2016 on listed and state-owned companies in Austria, we give an empirical account of the conditions that assure effective self-regulation. Arguing that codes suffer from what we call "opportunity bias", we conclude that political goals (such as gender equality) based on ethical rather than instrumental considerations are unlikely to be effectively implemented solely by codes of good governance.

Item Type: Article
Additional Information: Open access funding provided by Vienna University of Economics and Business (WU).
Keywords: Women on boards, Gender diversity, Codes of good governance, Self-regulation, Institutional theory
Divisions: Forschungsinstitute > Urban Management and Governance
Forschungsinstitute > Urban Management and Governance > Meyer
Version of the Document: Published
Depositing User: Gertraud Novotny
Date Deposited: 18 Nov 2019 08:02
Last Modified: 18 Nov 2019 08:02
Related URLs:
FIDES Link: https://bach.wu.ac.at/d/research/results/92547/
URI: https://epub.wu.ac.at/id/eprint/7310

Actions

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics